Who of the six Catholic justices in the US Supreme Court is/are believing pedophiles? And what abt a muslim justice believing in Mohammed?!

There are six Catholics, two Jews & one Protestant (who is leaving) in the US Supreme Court. This despite the fact that of the US population the majority faith is nonreligious - and without representation! In other words, a quarter of the population is represented by two thirds of the Supreme Court! And what if the muslim born & Sharia respecting Mr X "president" sneaks in a believer in the pedophilic Mohammed?! Then the pedophiles truly get a strong voice, don't they!

In a sample of 80 “normal” volunteers, over 25% self-reported some pedophilic interest or in the plethysmographic phase exhibited penile arousal to a child that equaled or exceeded arousal to an adult (Hall, Hirschman, & Oliver, 1995).

Klevius comment: As nothing seems to indicate that Catholics in general (Catholic priests may be an alltogether other case!) are less pedophilic than the normal population, statistically pedophilic Catholic Supreme Court justices proportionally represent all (i.e. some quarter of the population) US Catholics!

Klevius question to YOU: Why are you so stupid? It's YOU who have made these religious madmen possible!

All this naked political, or purely sexist monotheist "religiosity" makes one really puke. They're ALL based on sexist rapetivism.

Zero "gods" or Millions of "gods" makes sense - oneness doesn't make any sense other than as a personal or collective excuse for racist/sexist actions! You just let yourself be cheated by the very evilness you think you avoid! Ancestor warship orbited around a family growing to a clan & tribe, & further to a city state, nation & empire. However, during the process "god" transformed to God, i.e. a baptized nothingness serving evil! Good deeds were performed between people by referring to this evil idol, while evil deeds were excused as "the will of God".

A single "god" is a logical contradiction. How could two people ever imagine the same (this naivity is also called realism)? And how could a single "god" ever exist (abt existence see Klevius' book Demand for Resources (1992)?

To really get a deeper hold on this you better read the net's best explanation (sic) of how your brain works, EMAH (the even more astonishing hypothesis).

What's the difference between Goel Ratzon (30 contemporary wives) & Mohammed (12 wives)?

Klevius answer: Mohammed/islam was more violent & totalitarian!

Why have both Goel Ratzon & islam prevailed in their strange behavior?

Klevius answer: Because so many women are so stupid.

Why are so many women so stupid?

Klevius answer: Because of sex segregation, dude! When will you really get the enormity of sex segregation? It's not "god" given, it's your fault! And no, Klevius gives a damn if you are asexual, heterosexual or homosexual or suffering from nymphomania etc. Although much of the issue is confused by talk abt "sexuality", sex has nothing to do with it outside the question of rape/selfrape! We're talking abt SEX SEGREGATION ^ Klevius seems still to be your best resource on the subject!

Of course Klevius is extremely flattered being the only one on (so far) to address the most important sociological issue on the net. However, the very fact of being alone also aids to compromise/negate the issue, not the least because of the spread of evil sexist islam (or is this a consequence of Klevius & all the girls/women who have started questioning sex segregation - albeit without necessarily hitting/understanding the core (precisely because they're females), male heterosexual attraction & its devastating effects on girls/women (& men) unless they understand to connect it with patterns of cultural sex segregation)?


Cure your ignorance abt women, men, psychoanalysis, feminism & islam:

Klevius psychosocial timeline on Sigmund Freud's lifelong attempt to defend how he treated his wife.
Klevius sex tutorial (incl. Klevius concept of rapetivism)
From Klevius without love (incl. the 1921 ban on the world's best female football team)
Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state (the most important sociological paper from the last century)
Gametes have no sex
Marriage, kinship, friendship
Childless female child psychoanalysts in search for "femininity" based on "motherhood" (the sarcastic quote marks are there to indicate that both are cultural inventions - perhaps caused by an over-emphasized wish to capitalize on child birth/breast-feeding for the purpose of defending sex segregation).
From Freud to bin Laden


THE TRUE ORIGIN OF VIKINGS

And finally, if you want the real truth abt the historical Viking phenomenon go to Origin of Vikings
After reading it I'd guess your world isn't any longer the world it used to be! Moreover, I'd guess most of you initially think this is just another angle on the subject, &, after reading it, are forced to agree it's by far the best overall explanation of historical facts, no matter you like it or not. Why? Simply because of Klevius methodology, i.e. to dare to see islam for what it is, not for what you'd like it to be! What? Am I exaggerating islam's role? Absolutely not, because my (& Koran's) definition of islam is: parasitism based on slaves & sex slaves embedded in an immorality built of infidel racism! Only this will explain islam's rapid initial spread. And like cancer needs blood vessels, islam needs a host civilization that can feed its growth! All civilizations "visited"/contaminated with islam have slowly deteriorated into a state of ultimate misery, the Ottoman "empire" being the last example.

Klevius Christmas greeting to Mr. Mohammed & Mr Pope: You represent the worst enemies of the female sex!

B. Hussein Obama, a stupid (compared to, for example, Bush), muslim born & anti-constitutional (see left & here) fifth columnist who suddenly emerged out of the extremely politically corrupt & dirty swamp of the super racist/sexist Nation of islam territory in Ill., will now offer the homophobic evangelical minister Rick Warren to give the inaugural invocation. This is the guy who compared same-sex couples to incest!

The Pope, on his part, has revealed not only his deep Homophobia but also a staggering insensitivity for human values. In a populist move he hence allies himself with the darkest power of the human mind. According to the Pope, defending heterosexuality (read opposing e.g. same-sex or non-sexual couples) is as important as saving the world's rain forests from destruction.

Klevius comment: Wrong Mr Pope! You can't destroy heterosexual attraction without erasing one of the sexes, precisely because it is biological, i.e. the opposite to what you are talking abt!

Viewing the cultural (sex segregated) distinction between men and women as central to human nature is a slap in the face not only of HBT people but also against women in general as well as many men. There simply doesn't exist "an order set down by creation", but rather its opposite, namely evolution, which means change. The "order set down by creation" is rather written by men in patriarchal cultures, who then refer to Nature or God or whatever other cultural invention!

When Benedict describes "gender theories which lead towards the definitive emancipation of man from creation" he, in fact, repeats a common feminist theme, i.e. the defending of cultural sex prejudices such as "femininity" (as opposed to the biological woman's attraction affecting, albeit not determining, men)! To better understand this crucial issue start at From Klevius without love

The "fundamental difference in creation between men and women" has a long history in civilized societies (to which islam has never belonged, & perhaps therefore has copied its worst forms) but became utterly sexist in the Mideastern conjunction, which fact is reflected in Indo-European & Semitic linguistic sexism, e.g. the notorious (& stupid) he/she pronoun apartheid which is lacking in almost all othe languages, as repeatedly noted by Klevius (1981, 1984, 1992, 1993, 1896, 1999 etc). Ok, as a fluent speaker of Finnish it was easy for me to see it...

ARE WE REALLY TOO FEW ON THE PLANET?!

Klevius comment: To create a baby you don't necessarily need a sexual act between a male & a female at all (a friendly donor & self-insemination will do). However, what you really need is a nine month period of extra physical pressure, a laborious & often painful delivery, + perhaps, breasts available for breast-feeding for an additional nine+ months.

The burden of all of this is laid on the female sex. In addition, females are also institutionalized, through sex segregation, to sexually satisfy males. This isn't to say that females might not want to have sex too, it's to say that the only difference that really matters is heterosexual attraction (HSA) implanted in males but not in females. Many a girl/woman wrongly assume that their culturally (due to sex segregation) boosted & skewed interest in boys/men equals HSA, when it's, in fact, only a combination of biological receptiveness (usually once a month at the most), & a cultural (& completely unnecessary) inferiority complex (phallus envy) caused by the very sex segregation that the Pope & the Mohammedan ideology so fanatically defend. Give it up cause there's no return anyway - only a prolonging of the suffering from this stupid sex apartheid which in KLEVUX terminology results in rapetivism & self-rape!

Islam/Koran (by far the worst crime ever against humanity) not only clearly still sanctions slavery but also stipulates for women a compulsory role as sex slaves - either as muslim wives or as "infidel whores"! In addition Sharia imprisons women as biological & cultural reproducers of more muslims, i.e. more of the very same culture that enslaved them in the first place.

Mohammed's foremost representative for islamofascist rapetivism today is the Saud/Wahhab "house".

Also note that the real Papacy started as a reaction against early islamofascism. However, due to its sexist Mideastern roots (grown via Rome) this allergic reaction ("islamophobia") against islamofascism caused not only Inquisition but also Catholic backwardness & sex segregation (see e.g. Ayaan Hirsi Ali & the Enlightenment). This is why the former opponents now both gather around their common evil issue (see also Klevius groundbreaking 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state).

Analysis copyright (intellectual property) Peter Klevius, a true scientist not to be confused with "scientific assistant" professors & political charlatan professors!

Btw, isn't it funny that while thousands read my blogs year after year, extremely few (a couple of my supporters & a couple of brainless nuts) dare to comment/refer. At least two explanations seem possible. Either I'm below average understanding of the world, or my conclusions are just too heavy to carry &/or comment on or refer to. However, if you use Klevius analysis without referring to them while in other instances defending a citation custom, then you might face a moral issue, don't you! Yes, I'm also lending without telling, but only in details, never on heavy conclusions/hypothesis!

also see Klevius analysis of e.g.

The Origin of Civilizations
The Origin of Vikings
The Origin of Man
The Origin of Mind