Peter Klevius science blog

World's oldest (29,000BP) portrait found in Central Europe and dated by space technology

Islam (OIC) is the worst threat to Human Rights

Sex apartheid - one reason why islam is incompatible with Human Rights

We're all born unequal, that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it), and islam (the worst crime ever) is the foremost expression of sex apartheid. By 'islam' Klevius of course means OIC's Human Rights violating Sharia declaration.

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Klevius Christmas greeting to Mr. Mohammed & Mr Pope: You represent the worst enemies of the female sex!

B. Hussein Obama, a stupid (compared to, for example, Bush), muslim born & anti-constitutional (see left & here) fifth columnist who suddenly emerged out of the extremely politically corrupt & dirty swamp of the super racist/sexist Nation of islam territory in Ill., will now offer the homophobic evangelical minister Rick Warren to give the inaugural invocation. This is the guy who compared same-sex couples to incest!

The Pope, on his part, has revealed not only his deep Homophobia but also a staggering insensitivity for human values. In a populist move he hence allies himself with the darkest power of the human mind. According to the Pope, defending heterosexuality (read opposing e.g. same-sex or non-sexual couples) is as important as saving the world's rain forests from destruction.

Klevius comment: Wrong Mr Pope! You can't destroy heterosexual attraction without erasing one of the sexes, precisely because it is biological, i.e. the opposite to what you are talking abt!

Viewing the cultural (sex segregated) distinction between men and women as central to human nature is a slap in the face not only of HBT people but also against women in general as well as many men. There simply doesn't exist "an order set down by creation", but rather its opposite, namely evolution, which means change. The "order set down by creation" is rather written by men in patriarchal cultures, who then refer to Nature or God or whatever other cultural invention!

When Benedict describes "gender theories which lead towards the definitive emancipation of man from creation" he, in fact, repeats a common feminist theme, i.e. the defending of cultural sex prejudices such as "femininity" (as opposed to the biological woman's attraction affecting, albeit not determining, men)! To better understand this crucial issue start at From Klevius without love

The "fundamental difference in creation between men and women" has a long history in civilized societies (to which islam has never belonged, & perhaps therefore has copied its worst forms) but became utterly sexist in the Mideastern conjunction, which fact is reflected in Indo-European & Semitic linguistic sexism, e.g. the notorious (& stupid) he/she pronoun apartheid which is lacking in almost all othe languages, as repeatedly noted by Klevius (1981, 1984, 1992, 1993, 1896, 1999 etc). Ok, as a fluent speaker of Finnish it was easy for me to see it...

ARE WE REALLY TOO FEW ON THE PLANET?!

Klevius comment: To create a baby you don't necessarily need a sexual act between a male & a female at all (a friendly donor & self-insemination will do). However, what you really need is a nine month period of extra physical pressure, a laborious & often painful delivery, + perhaps, breasts available for breast-feeding for an additional nine+ months.

The burden of all of this is laid on the female sex. In addition, females are also institutionalized, through sex segregation, to sexually satisfy males. This isn't to say that females might not want to have sex too, it's to say that the only difference that really matters is heterosexual attraction (HSA) implanted in males but not in females. Many a girl/woman wrongly assume that their culturally (due to sex segregation) boosted & skewed interest in boys/men equals HSA, when it's, in fact, only a combination of biological receptiveness (usually once a month at the most), & a cultural (& completely unnecessary) inferiority complex (phallus envy) caused by the very sex segregation that the Pope & the Mohammedan ideology so fanatically defend. Give it up cause there's no return anyway - only a prolonging of the suffering from this stupid sex apartheid which in KLEVUX terminology results in rapetivism & self-rape!

Islam/Koran (by far the worst crime ever against humanity) not only clearly still sanctions slavery but also stipulates for women a compulsory role as sex slaves - either as muslim wives or as "infidel whores"! In addition Sharia imprisons women as biological & cultural reproducers of more muslims, i.e. more of the very same culture that enslaved them in the first place.

Mohammed's foremost representative for islamofascist rapetivism today is the Saud/Wahhab "house".

Also note that the real Papacy started as a reaction against early islamofascism. However, due to its sexist Mideastern roots (grown via Rome) this allergic reaction ("islamophobia") against islamofascism caused not only Inquisition but also Catholic backwardness & sex segregation (see e.g. Ayaan Hirsi Ali & the Enlightenment). This is why the former opponents now both gather around their common evil issue (see also Klevius groundbreaking 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state).

Analysis copyright (intellectual property) Peter Klevius, a true scientist not to be confused with "scientific assistant" professors & political charlatan professors!

Btw, isn't it funny that while thousands read my blogs year after year, extremely few (a couple of my supporters & a couple of brainless nuts) dare to comment/refer. At least two explanations seem possible. Either I'm below average understanding of the world, or my conclusions are just too heavy to carry &/or comment on or refer to. However, if you use Klevius analysis without referring to them while in other instances defending a citation custom, then you might face a moral issue, don't you! Yes, I'm also lending without telling, but only in details, never on heavy conclusions/hypothesis!

also see Klevius analysis of e.g.

The Origin of Civilizations
The Origin of Vikings
The Origin of Man
The Origin of Mind

No comments: