Wednesday, March 24, 2010
While OIC Sharia islam violates girls/women's Human Rights media is silent! Why?
Ignorance, not bombs, is the main reason so many haven't as yet understood that islam was/is the worst crime ever against humanity (remember, unlike islam, Klevius considers girls/women as fully humans - without any reserve)!
Klevius comment: The OIC process of introducing Human Rights violations against girls/women has been ongoing for some time. However, although you will find many news every day abt OIC, Sharia and finance, you will not find a single one abt OIC Sharia and women! Time to wake up?!
This gives a tiny glimpse of how Google is able to steer what it likes/dislikes you to you see! It wasn't necessarily you who elected muslim (i.e. against freedom & US constitution) Mr X "president", it was Google & Co!
The by far most important news issue now is the ongoing slaughtering of Negative Human Rights through islam's terror campaign against them in the UN & elsewhere!
The Saudi Caliph was muslim born Mr X "president's" first call! And when you look at his pals you may understand why!Girls/women! Don't count on these "men"!
Pinar Ilkkaracan in Do women and girls have human rights?: At the 1995 conference in Beijing there were already signs of backlash, among them an evident increase in coordination efforts by the religious conservative opposition. An alliance of Muslim and Christian (mainly Catholic) delegations made sexuality - sexual orientation, women's control of their bodies and abortion - a topic of major debate, and strongly objected to the term "women's and girls' sexual rights".
The remarkably smooth, friendly cooperation between Christian and Muslim religious conservatives there (illustrated by Catholic nuns in their habits and Muslim women waering hijab walking arm-in-arm.
At the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) in March 2003 a group of conservative Muslim delegates tried to reverse gains women had made over many years by rejecting a previously agreed-upon text.
At the United Nations general assembly special session (Ungass) on HIV/Aids+5, held in New York in 2006, all Muslim states joined together for the first time at a UN Ecosoc meeting under the banner of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC). OIC provided an umbrella for all Muslim states to forge a "Muslim identity" to challenge several proposals (especially those related to sexuality) made by Northern states.
Klevius comment: Pinar Ilkkaracan, who accused Bush & Co for this backlash, wrote this in 2007, before the muslim Mr X "president" introduced the real backlash, an even much more conservative Saudi inspired islamic agenda on sex segregation! Take a look, for example, at Wahhabi inspired & Saudi funded president of the Islamic Society of North America Ingrid Mattson (seen at Mr X "president's" left ear above)!
Klevius, your unbiased IQ rock when Google, Wikipedia etc betray you!
Klevius comment: The OIC process of introducing Human Rights violations against girls/women has been ongoing for some time. However, although you will find many news every day abt OIC, Sharia and finance, you will not find a single one abt OIC Sharia and women! Time to wake up?!
This gives a tiny glimpse of how Google is able to steer what it likes/dislikes you to you see! It wasn't necessarily you who elected muslim (i.e. against freedom & US constitution) Mr X "president", it was Google & Co!
The by far most important news issue now is the ongoing slaughtering of Negative Human Rights through islam's terror campaign against them in the UN & elsewhere!
The Saudi Caliph was muslim born Mr X "president's" first call! And when you look at his pals you may understand why!Girls/women! Don't count on these "men"!
Pinar Ilkkaracan in Do women and girls have human rights?: At the 1995 conference in Beijing there were already signs of backlash, among them an evident increase in coordination efforts by the religious conservative opposition. An alliance of Muslim and Christian (mainly Catholic) delegations made sexuality - sexual orientation, women's control of their bodies and abortion - a topic of major debate, and strongly objected to the term "women's and girls' sexual rights".
The remarkably smooth, friendly cooperation between Christian and Muslim religious conservatives there (illustrated by Catholic nuns in their habits and Muslim women waering hijab walking arm-in-arm.
At the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) in March 2003 a group of conservative Muslim delegates tried to reverse gains women had made over many years by rejecting a previously agreed-upon text.
At the United Nations general assembly special session (Ungass) on HIV/Aids+5, held in New York in 2006, all Muslim states joined together for the first time at a UN Ecosoc meeting under the banner of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC). OIC provided an umbrella for all Muslim states to forge a "Muslim identity" to challenge several proposals (especially those related to sexuality) made by Northern states.
Klevius comment: Pinar Ilkkaracan, who accused Bush & Co for this backlash, wrote this in 2007, before the muslim Mr X "president" introduced the real backlash, an even much more conservative Saudi inspired islamic agenda on sex segregation! Take a look, for example, at Wahhabi inspired & Saudi funded president of the Islamic Society of North America Ingrid Mattson (seen at Mr X "president's" left ear above)!
Klevius, your unbiased IQ rock when Google, Wikipedia etc betray you!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment