Is Klevius your only (so far) key to an in depth understanding of islam ?

While the Saudi puppet (i.e. Mr X who calls himself "president") in the White House "respects" islamic rapings, assaults & murders*, Klevius condemns them & offers a key that opens the Koran without learning Arabic or consulting islamists.

* Islam is (as everyone - except brainwashed school kids - should know by now) based on jihadist enslavement & rapetivism! No matter if it was/is through violent conquest or "peaceful" trading in slaves/women!

In order to show how/why Peter Klevius is still unique in addressing sex segregation as the main interface between Western Enlightenment & the Oriental beast, one needs to understand the history of the rapid initial spreading of what was quickly to become the worst crime ever against humanity.

The background for islamic/muslim sex slavery has been described by many but can be exemplified here through K. A. Lal:

"In the campaigns launched by Muslims, it was easy to capture women, more so after their menfolk had been massacred. The Prophet's one great aim was propagation of his religion and as Margoliouth observes, Abu Bakr (the chief campaigner for Muhammad’s creed) probably was aware that women are more amenable to conversion than men slaves than freemen, persons in distress than persons in prosperity and affluence. Women slaves turned concubines could increase Muslim population by leaps and bounds when captured in large numbers. Hence there was particular keenness on enslaving women from the very beginning of Islam."

So what does Klevius add to this?

Klevius is the first one (see e.g. Klevius psychosocial Freud timeline - you know, the guy who said that "women need a normal penis several times" to avoid going nuts, & From Klevius without love) to point out that:

Industrialization (released by protestants against totalitarian religion) paved the way for Negative Human Rights & the idea that every individual, no matter of sex, etc should be free. As a result all women (except muslim women) in the Western civilization are free & on an equal judicial standing with men. However, Western society, although the birthplace for Negative Human Rights is still contaminated by cultural sex segregation, hence contributing to the social inflammation called islam. A clue to understanding Klevius analysis is his analysis of feminism, i.e. that true feminism is what the word implies, i.e. the guarding & segregation of cultural 'femininity'. One has to realize that true feminism thus has a lot in common with islam although many have misunderstood this.

There's only one original islam but a variety of ignorance among muslims

The pathetic excuse that "most muslims are moderate" shoould in fact read "most muslims don't have a clue abt what islam is outside what they have heard from some imams"! Most muslims would leave islam if they'd known (or if they'd dared to). The other option being a moderate apostasy from islam into Western civilization (& with four wives).