Peter Klevius science blog

World's oldest (29,000BP) portrait found in Central Europe and dated by space technology

Islam (OIC) is the worst threat to Human Rights

Sex apartheid - one reason why islam is incompatible with Human Rights

We're all born unequal, that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation (sad, isn't it), and islam (the worst crime ever) is the foremost expression of sex apartheid. By 'islam' Klevius of course means OIC's Human Rights violating Sharia declaration.

Friday, October 03, 2008

Slave girls, the gold of the "golden age of islam", the worst crime ever,



Racist/sexist slave islam - the naive "religious" interpretation of "Allah's humble slave" has nothing to do with real islam in which it's a handy expression to (im)morally cover (up) both slavery & ultimate colonialism/imperialism/slave-capitalism. In other words, it defends the worst form of parasitism by pretending that the parasite is also a slave, albeit one or two steps up the hierarchy.



Hate-monger Saudi Wahhabi "king" (Saudi's wealth was created by African slaves on date plantations!) & one of his victims. This is the criminal who wants to make criticism of islam a crime!


The islamic rapetivism formula is based on over-population & under-development (i.e. an unprecedented impotency of feeding itself - compare, for example Shinto - the world's oldest religion - meets islam - the worst crime ever against humanity).

Sean O'Callaghan (in a late 20th Century report): "(In Saudi Arabia) the slave population was estimated at 450,000. Slave auctions are no longer held regularly, only in an alley in Mecca." And abt Yemen: "The Yemeni told me that the girls (slave girls used as prostitutes) were encouraged to have children, especially by white men. For if a slave girl had a white child, she was given a bonus of £20 when the child was taken from her". As you can see, the child of a slave remained a slave, the owner could sell the child and make money. This sale is allowable under Islamic law. "Why had the slave girls accepted their fate without a murmur, the boys howled and cried?" "Simple" said the Somali, we tell the girls from a very early age - 7 or 8 that they are made for sex, at age nine we let them practice with each other, and a year later with the boys".

Klevius comment: This is sex segregation in its most open, inhumane & brutal form. The small poor girls have no idea abt heterosexual attraction (many big girls do not either) and (like many free girls/women) are completely disconnected from the thought of them being equals to males. Möre widely seen heterosexual attraction is a blessing that easily turns into a curse even among the relations of ordinary people. If your clothes are made of thousands of $100 notes, don’t be too surprised if someone wants to strip you without much thought abt what’s inside your head. This curse is made almost invisible due to the fact that it’s confused with physical sex per se and/or cultural traditions of sex.

Read more abt slave girls on the world's most progressive & informed interdisciplinary analysis of the Origin of Vikings, a historical phenomenon that has, until Klevius, been both used as a tool for 19th Century supremacist Swedish nationalism as well as its politically correct opposite of today. Ironically the latter version coincides with an equally stupid and unfounded but politically corect bolstering of that very islam that was the real evil factor behind the Vikings. Without islam no Viking phenomenon!

Isn't it amazing how helpless many historians are in seeing self-evident connections? Well, not really, but political! According to Klevius, what is termed qualitative science is in fact political science, clearly distinguished from quantitative science which is unpolitical (don't get confused now with pre- & post scientifical processes which don't belong to science at all but are pre- & post-histories of choice). In my book Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor (1992:40-41 chapt. Science & references) I use the example of a test person who repeatedly gets an egg in his head. Whereas the physicist (scientist) may draw unchallenged conclusions serving later scientists on the sam topic, the psychologist (politician) may not (someone who smiles after the first egg might not repeat it after the third). More abt science Inside Klevius mind & EMAH, the even more astonishing hypothesis & Demand for Resources - on human wants & needs!

BTW, if you feel uncertain abt what to say to people without "insulting" them, just limit your talking to white unbelieving males! They have no "insult" immunity whatsoever(i.e. you can't be accused for racism or sexism), & if you aren't white yourself, you can always hope they slip with their tongues! Isn't it wonderful?!